Dear Community,

I am proposing this tip with multiple goals, in brief they are:

1. To provide a reward to Adam (8 KSM)
2. To test the use of batch statements to issue rewards
3. Fund [an account](https://kusama.subscan.io/account/Gch4VxQ79WhjgQqHomvJbqF3Woza5g5cYgM8SVQdDb9szz1?tab=extrinsic) used for public validator payouts as a `finder's fee` (2 KSM)

The main recipient of funding from this tip is Adam Steebar for compiling and maintaining [details related to Open Governance](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DHgjfaV0bvYVlsQswEM0EltuYnpYl7GJdg24H-sFpiM/edit#gid=663805148) with recent runtime releases.  He has also engaged in discussion on github relating to same [here ](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6398)and [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6409).  Despite the outcome I appreciate that he applied his Economics skill set to aid the community.

Additionally, I am taking an opportunity to test batch calls for issuing tips.  In the previous governance model the system required a single primary recipient of tip funding, this test allows for a split of tips among different parties.  If this executes successfully it establishes a model for future payments requiring such action.

Finally, I am directing 20% of this 'Tip' to an account used by a public staking reward payout bot.  This fee is the equivalent of the now debunked finder's fee of the old governance while awarding the recipient the maximum of what would have been a small tip.  

I look forward to a successful test.

Regards,






:
1. Providing reward to Adam Steebar for compiling and maintaining Open Governance related details (8 KSM).
2. Testing the use of batch statements to issue rewards.
3. Directing 20% of this 'Tip' to an account for a public staking reward payout bot as a 'finder's fee' (2 KSM).

#253 For analysis of Open Gov parameters

No Active Proposals