Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Medium Spender

On-chain Power of Attorney: case study in the Polkadot ecosystem from a legal perspective.

inMedium Spender
3 years ago
Executed

A while back I started preparing a proposal for writing 3 articles within the broader topic of privacy preserving legal transformation in Polkadot. You can find the previous proposal here. I had sought feedback via the Kusama Direction channel back then and the topic of Power of Attorney (PoA) was a clear favorite. Therefore, I have now decided to pursue that topic specifically.

To reinforce that, I got feedback from the community members that as a first step to win the community's trust and prove added value, it might be better to focus on a smaller funding amount and as such limit the proposal to just one article. That's exactly my plan now.

Finally, I've been told that by limiting the scope of research to the Swiss law only, the impact for the community might be reduced. As such, I've decided to expand the scope and focus on building a general legal framework to regulate on-chain PoA. The authorities (especially in Europe) will face the same types of challenges when dealing with digitising the legal system and I aim to provide a framework and guidelines for addressing these issues from first principles (both legal and technological). In order to ground my research in a practical environment and not just theoretical constructs, I will use the Swiss juridical system to provide examples where appropriate.

You can find the full proposal on my GitHub. Below is the summary of the topic and as always, feedback is very welcome:

On-chain Power of Attorney: challenges and promises for a legal system.

  • How is PoA currently enforced in EU & Switzerland, who benefits from it and who can abuse it?
  • Private key ?= full access revisited: a need for additional, trusted verification (or else take all my money).
  • A partially government-controlled blockchain - pros and cons. Could a parachain be the solution?
  • Encrypted 'allow-revoke' mechanism, revealable only to selected parties, by the means of substrate chain and a user-friendly app.

The resulting research article will be submitted to an open-access journal.

Comments (7)

3 years ago

The full proposal information is available here.

3 years ago

I voted yes since I like it as an experiment that is fitting to Kusama. It is was also a good idea to try it with one paper first.

Just some comments:

  • I think 5h for writing an academic paper of 10 pages that can be submitted to a journal is unrealistically low (even after having performed the research of 1 month full time). Then again, charging 75 CHF / hour for a post-graduate student is too much since even doctoral students earn much less in Switzerland.
  • Make sure that the submitted article is in open access. Kusama treasury typically only funds work that is made available as open source.
Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

DOT
49.73K DOT

Proposal Passed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (187)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (10)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy