Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Medium Spender

Establishing a bounty for Collators of System Parachains.

inMedium Spender
3 years ago
Executed

Dear community,



This proposal seeks to fund collators of the Statemine network for the duration of 6 months as a pilot. If passed, a Collator will receive a performance based, fixed fiat reward of USD$300.00 per month as well a one time reimbursement for work previously provided. The proposal document was presented to current System Collators as well as Joe (W3F) and Zoltan (Encointer) to their satisfaction.


Additionally, I am taking the opportunity to test assigning a Curator to the bounty within the same proposal as approving it. This is usually undertaken as a separate process because the bounty needs to be approved before it can be assigned a Curator. Let's see how this goes, no time would be lost due to this experiment.


The Curators are namely:

  • FrankyWild (frankywild#8573)
  • Tim Jansen (Tim Janssen (Won't DM)#8682)
  • Husni (pastaMan#9738)

These individuals are members of the Moderation and Anti-scam teams and also have experience with bounty curation. They have also met the requirements as described within section 5.2 of the proposal.



Summary:

A System Parachain (S.C.) is defined as any Parachain which attained its lease via governance. This proposal aims to establish a framework for Collators on System Parachains to minimise censorship, maintain liveliness and incentivise efficient performance.

It attempts to achieve this by suggesting parameters for the selection, incentivisation and the ideal number of Collators on System Parachains. It is also anticipated that this framework would form a standard that would aid future System Parachains as they are deployed.

As a medium term solution, 1,873.69 KSM is requested to fund a bounty to incentivise Collators on the Statemine network for six (6) months. This would be used as a pilot test and re-evaluated before further funding is provided.


Full proposal

The full proposal can be accessed here.


Discussion

The proposal was left for open discussion for a duration of two weeks and received only one item of feedback.




Regards,

Will | Paradox

Comments (12)

3 years ago

Just to be clear, I'm not against the bounty itself I would support it 100% if it had different Curators (they know who they are). It seems like the ecosystem system keeps rewarding backstabbing. Plenty of good people in the ecosystem should get a chance to contribute.

3 years ago

Hello, may I ask what is your specific issue with the curators?

3 years ago

Hey Will,

Thank you for posting the proposal. The proposal audit overview is noted below.

Please note the Audit report is reflecting only the quality of information presented in the proposal and not the Quality of the project/idea itself.
108

Full Audit

The following proposal Audit is created as a part of Proposal #67.More information about Treasury proposal template and the Audit process can be found on the link above. All templates are free for everyone to use. For any questions or feedback regarding the Audit templates use discussion link from above.

Please note that views and opinions presented in the Audit report are my personal and they do not represent general community opinion.
PS. I am using Crust network as ecosystem solution for the storage. Please let me know if the files/links are unavailable.

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (244)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (30)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy