Back to treasury proposals
Treasury Proposal#52 >> Council Motion#230
Awarded
Requested: 74.49 KSM

#52 Proposal to expand the Polkadot ecosystem with a book for blockchain beginners

Proposer:
DWUA...TJ1j
 
in Treasury
20th Oct '20

Proponent: 12WarfbFeUm5L9Fs5zkTaQQH7L5hqaGPEgM9vQ1UFK8kiUSK

Date: 16th June 2021

Requested DOT: 829 DOT (in 3 installments @ $30.156/DOT using Subscan’s 30 day EMA) = ~$25,000

Short description: Although Ethereum is a much less complicated system, google ‘books on Ethereum’, then google ‘books on Polkadot’. You’ll notice that while there are more than 10 books on Ethereum, Polkadot (the network) has nothing. Of course, this is more a sign of age than anything, but I’m proposing a way to start our journey.

This proposal brings to light the lack of a holistic and easy-to-understand explanation of Polkadot in a book form. It outlines the importance of a book and proposes a solution to create one. But not just another book about blockchains but one focused on Polkadot and written from a totally non-technical perspective.

Please visit this link to read the full proposal

A first draft has already been drafted (90% finished). You can view the first draft here. Please leave your feedback to help shape the second draft.

The book will be published under a Creative Commons License (CC BY)

*Edited on 6th Oct 2021.

Show More

Deadline: Not Set
Please Log In to comment
Users are saying...
Based on all comments and replies

Overall 100 % of users are feeling neutral. Polkascan Foundation made a calculation error and will return $1,890 KSM to the Kusama Treasury upon approval of Treasury Proposal 52. The corrected calculation is available on GitHub, along with details about their Social Contract for operational expenses during November 2020 - January 2021 and avenues for change requests.

AI-generated from comments

4Comments
dashboard profile icon
tyrone
 
 
28th Jun '22

For continuously discussion, please keep comments on Previous discussion: https://kusama.polkassembly.io/post/1606

GLVe...F7wj
 
 
28th Jun '22

Please note the motion should be rejected as it is only voted by the Council - instead, and in harmony with the Standard Liquidity proposal Guidelines, this proposal should be voted by Council as an external motion, and voted by the community after for approval/rejection: this is why I have opened motion 505.


Discover similar proposals


Empty Icon

No Active Proposals