Dear community,

This referendum is two fold, it seeks to grant 0xTaylor a tip of 8 KSM but also tests OpenGov to see if it protects against spending more than the track allowance when using multiple transactions.  

0xTaylor is a popular actor within the ecosystem known for his input with security exploit related matters.  It is through his efforts that a blacklist was developed on Polkassembly, thus preventing users from applying usernames like `Admin` or `Administrator` which could otherwise be misleading.  He also reported `Hasura GQL endpoint` exploits to various teams that utilize the service, an example of which can be found [here](https://t.me/rmrkimpl/2717).  0xTaylor is also known for his input within the ChaosDAO and WagMedia communities members of which have endorsed his receipt of a tip.

On the note of security, I took this as an opportunity to test the coding of OpenGov with regards to multiple spends within a single batched transaction.  This proposal seeks to spend 16 KSM in two batches of 8 KSM. The first and 'guaranteed' execution being made to `0xTaylor`, in the unlikely event that there is a bug then another 8 KSM would be awarded to [an account](https://kusama.subscan.io/account/Gch4VxQ79WhjgQqHomvJbqF3Woza5g5cYgM8SVQdDb9szz1) for Public Kusama Staking Rewards Payout BOT.

If the second extrinsic executes then maximum spend per track would essentially be `Max spend` * `Number of transactions that can be fit within a batch`.  

Regards,
 

- **Problem Statement:** Testing OpenGov's ability to prevent overspending in multiple transactions, while also rewarding 0xTaylor with 8 KSM.
- **Significance:** Ensuring system integrity and preventing overspending in transactions.
- **Proposed Solution:** Granting 8 KSM to 0xTaylor and testing OpenGov's functionality with two 8 KSM transactions.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Validation of OpenGov's ability to handle multiple transactions and secure fund allocation.

#251 To 0xTaylor for security related reports & community founding