Back to referenda
Executed

#49 Reorganize Advisory Committee

Proposer:
Jaco
 
in Council
28th Apr '20

Rewrite of #28, which used a filtered call to change the members of the AC.

A new year rolls around and Zeitgeist reorganizes the Advisory Committee to optimize the deployment process of curated markets and the flow of liquidity. The remaining market is controlled by key personnel who will be overseeing the curation of markets.

Show More

Voting
Simple Majority
Passed
100.0%Aye
AyeNay
0.0%Nay
Aye(1)
67.2K KSM
Nay(0)
0.0 KSM
Turnout
67.2K KSM
Issuance
16.2M KSM
Please Log In to comment
Users are saying...
Based on all comments and replies

Overall 100 % of users are feeling against it. The council's proposal to eliminate prefix 0xf2794c22e353e9a839f12faab03a911bf68967d635641a7087e53f2bff1ecad3, crucial for democracy.preimages, fails due to the recent upgrade not migrating older preimages and changing storage type, rendering current submissions unsuccessful until format adjustments are made.

AI-generated from comments

10Comments
Chevdor
 
 
24th Apr '20

Voted Aye

CP287, would you mind editing the description so we show the example ? :) Also, a short description of the reason why you think your proposal is good would be nice (Although I personally already seconded it).

CP287-CLOUDWALK
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye

Chevdor, I still cant do that, cause i cant link my address to my account. The reason for that is because polkadotjs extension support import only from the seed.

About proposal: still think that it is necessary to slowly increase the number of validators until this interferes with the stability of the network, and do it fast enough. This will allow the number of nominations not to exceed 64. This will allow new members to become validators, and not just to generate accounts for existing members. This will allow us to test the capabilities of the network in this direction. If we do this fast enough, it will even lead to greater decentralization (on the contrary, if we do not do this, soon only large companies will remain in the validators, each of which will hold 40-50 validators, and which ultimately grealy increase commissions for nominators).

Chevdor
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye

Oh I get you... now that makes sense. It unfortunately does not look like it will come: https://github.com/polkadot-js/extension/issues/185#issuecomment-546227834

Not sure if you know about this one, it is interesting to know:

Chevdor
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye

I made a proposal that may help addressing this issue here https://github.com/paritytech/polkassembly/issues/719

CP287-CLOUDWALK
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye


Discover similar proposals


Empty Icon

No Active Proposals