Back to referenda
Not Passed

#30 On chain democracy proposal

Proposer:
Chevdor
 
in Democracy
4th Mar '20

This content (and title) can be edited by the proposal author to explain the rationale behind the proposal.

Show More

Please Log In to comment

10Comments
Chevdor
 
 
24th Apr '20

Voted Aye

CP287, would you mind editing the description so we show the example ? :) Also, a short description of the reason why you think your proposal is good would be nice (Although I personally already seconded it).

CP287-CLOUDWALK
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye

Chevdor, I still cant do that, cause i cant link my address to my account. The reason for that is because polkadotjs extension support import only from the seed.

About proposal: still think that it is necessary to slowly increase the number of validators until this interferes with the stability of the network, and do it fast enough. This will allow the number of nominations not to exceed 64. This will allow new members to become validators, and not just to generate accounts for existing members. This will allow us to test the capabilities of the network in this direction. If we do this fast enough, it will even lead to greater decentralization (on the contrary, if we do not do this, soon only large companies will remain in the validators, each of which will hold 40-50 validators, and which ultimately grealy increase commissions for nominators).

Chevdor
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye

Oh I get you... now that makes sense. It unfortunately does not look like it will come: https://github.com/polkadot-js/extension/issues/185#issuecomment-546227834

Not sure if you know about this one, it is interesting to know:

Chevdor
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye

I made a proposal that may help addressing this issue here https://github.com/paritytech/polkassembly/issues/719

CP287-CLOUDWALK
 
 
25th Apr '20

Voted Aye


Discover similar proposals


Empty Icon

No Active Proposals