Dear community,

Referendum 182 seeks to register an identity for council person JAM.  JAM is one of the early council members and you can get an appreciation of his 'genesis story' [here](https://youtu.be/B0Fex0fSYkQ).  His lack of a registered identity was a personal peeve so with an empty public queue I seized the opportunity for a soft-topic.  

I should have done the same for Bruno via batch but it was a total omission on my part. With [resignation](https://bruno.id/withdrawing-from-polkadot-and-kusama-council/) in mind perhaps it wasn't that bad of an omission.

We are generally caught up with referenda of technical matters, governance can be used for softer matters as well.  Let's see how it goes.

Regards,
Will | Paradox

Provide a judgement for an account's identity.

The dispatch origin for this call must be _Signed_ and the sender must be the account
of the registrar whose index is `reg_index`.

- `reg_index`: the index of the registrar whose judgement is being made.
- `target`: the account whose identity the judgement is upon. This must be an account
  with a registered identity.
- `judgement`: the judgement of the registrar of index `reg_index` about `target`.

Emits `JudgementGiven` if successful.

# <weight>
- `O(R + X)`.
- One balance-transfer operation.
- Up to one account-lookup operation.
- Storage: 1 read `O(R)`, 1 mutate `O(R + X)`.
- One event.
# </weight>

- Referendum 182 is about registering an identity for council person JAM.
- JAM is one of the early council members.
- The referendum is about a soft-topic, not a technical matter.
- The person who wrote the post forgot to do the same for Bruno.
- Bruno is resigning from Polkadot and Kusama council.

#182 Get JAM a verified identity!

No Active Proposals