My proposal was to Redenominate Kusama 100:1 and thereby bring all of the benefits of DOT Referendum #52 to Kusama.  As listed under Referendum #52.  The main benefit of this change is to avoid using small decimals when dealing with DOT and to achieve an easier calculation system.  Since Kusama is billed as the value brand between the two sister chains, it is even more important to Kusama and yet Kusama will be using 2 extra decimals over DOT.  Additionally, as I now know others have mentioned, the redomination would bring conversations, comparisons, etc between DOT and Kusama into an apples vs apples realm instead of the current apples vs golden apples situation we currently have.

Much has been made about DOT and KSMs ability to adapt and change without having to hard fork leading one to believe this change could be made with a simple on-chain rebase command which could change the entire blockchain.  Apparently this is not the case.  Apparently, it takes a massive amount of work to redenominate the  chain.  Even more so that when it was done with DOT as transfers have been enabled.  It is unfortunate because when DOT was redenominated, would not have been the best time to redenominate Kusama.  However, it now appears Kusama can never be redenominated, which is also going to be tragic.  It is already a problem, but as KSM becomes more and more valuable this problem is going to do nothing but become worse.

However, with all that said, at this point in the market cycle and DOT ecosystem lifecycle, there is absolutely nothing even as close as important as the deployment of the parachains.  This is one of the main premises the DOT ecosystem is built on and nothing must get in the way of it.

This is my mistake and if I had known it had been proposed before and if I knew how much work needed to be done to implement it, or if I had know how much confusion it could cause I never would have  proposed it.

To the developers, is there some ability to add rebase functionality into the code in a more convenient time in the future?  Or anyway to accomplish this at a more convenient time as there are substantial  benefits to KSM with the redenomination?

The proposal outlines AngelHack's Polkadot Global Series: APAC and Europe Edition, aiming to foster engagement within the Web3 community. AngelHack seeks funding for the event's execution, emphasizing its impact on developer outreach and project adoption within the Polkadot ecosystem.

Database Storage Structure Optimization: Improved the structure for better performance.

Database Data Cleanup: Removed redundant data for efficiency.

Merged prod-c data into prod-a: Consolidated database instances.

Node Service Testing and Migration to Onfinality: Transitioned node services for efficiency.

Resource Optimization: Adjusted resource usage for cost-effectiveness.

Data Backup Type Adjustment: Changed backup methods for cost savings.

Service Log Adjustment: Implemented a self-hosted log center for better monitoring and reduced costs.

 Make some on-chain remark.

 # <weight>
 - `O(1)`
 - Base Weight: 0.665 µs, independent of remark length.
 - No DB operations.
 # </weight>

- The proposal is to change the value of Kusama to make calculations easier.
- Kusama is currently using more decimals than DOT, which is not fair.
- Changing the value of Kusama would make it easier to compare it to DOT.
- It is difficult to make this change and it might not happen.
- Right now, the most important thing is to deploy the parachains.

#103 Now is not the Time; Vote Against This Proposal