Open Governance Test
3 years ago
Executed
Dear community,
This referendum was opened to test another aspect of OpenGov. I can't divulge the specifics at this point in time as it would introduce a bias. I can however say that the outcome of the vote is inconsequential.
Even with that said I would prefer a successful outcome to continue funding the account used by a public staking payout bot.
For those not familiar with my previous test please view the details here.
Have fun voting.
Regards,
Comments (4)
Requested

800.00 DOT
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (187)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (7)0.0 DOT
Thank-you for your service
The goal of this exercise was to trick the system into thinking that the
support
levels were not maintained thus delaying entry into the confirmation period. My thoughts were that I could do this repeatedly delaying the track and nullifying gov 2 agility. I hoped to achieve this by unvoting / revoting near the end of the decision period.This appeared to work but I think Al voted with 4000 KSM and that threw things off. I will investigate further and report.
Update:
I attempted to coax the system into returning to a
deciding
state from aconfirming
state by altering the levels of support just as the confirmation period began. I anticipated that reduced support would change the global state into thinking that the vote had not attained enoughsupport
and thus was not in a sufficient position to be confirmed.I was discrete with the details because I wanted a regular (smaller) turnout (~16-20k KSM) so that my vote would have a more profound impact on support levels.
Alistair's vote near the end of the decision period increased the support levels to a point that my vote became irrelevant and thus I couldn't test this properly.
Thanks for those who participated and note that funds were returned to the treasury.
Code reference .