Bounty top-up of the System Parachain Collators funding on Kusama
This is a proposal for a bounty top-up of the System Parachain Collators funding on Kusama. We are repeating this proposal since the referenda failed, in part due to last minute vote changed due to accusation of double spending. We hope to address this with this video and with the revised parts of the initial proposal. In addition - after the last proposal it was suggested that we elect a coordinator, which we did. Since Paradox has been doing this task for the past year he was suggested and endorsed as the coordinator. Furthermore - the market rate has since changed dramatically and we hope to be better aligned with the "new market rate" with the revised budget.
This funding will cover AssetHub, BridgeHub, Coretime, People and Encointer System Parachains on Kusama. This proposal supplements the original System Parachain Collator Proposal, and continues the proposal for System Parachain funding, aiming to incentivize the best performance, minimize censorship, and maintain liveliness by securing treasury funding for the operational costs of Kusama System Parachain Collators. Furthermore it expands its scope to three new System Parachains — Coretime, People and Encointer. Additionally — it introduces newly established methodology of selection criteria for invulnerable collator spots, as well as newly established bidding procedure for securing permissionless spots. All of this is detailed out in the Proposal document.
Funding Request: Infrastructure Costs and Staking Rewards Coverage: Five Kusama System Parachains (AssetHub, BridgeHub, Coretime, People and Encointer) Duration: 6-month runway Start Date: July 1, 2024 Funding Amount: 7,926.62 KSM for Kusama System Parachains
Note: Unlike most other treasury spends, this spend funds a bounty. If there is a disagreement with any particular portion of the budget we can not disburse it or return that portion to the Treasury. There are also some budget items that are provisional (like development, price fluctuation, administrative) and these are all reallocated to primary services if not used for the intended purpose.
Comments (9)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (61)0.0 PAS
Support0.0 PAS
Nay (44)0.0 PAS
Comments (9)
Can you add some contextual information please?
For some reason ref 445 is not showing on polkassembly for me so I used subsquare, but apparently they don't sync.
I was however able to access it via direct link, but I am unable to edit the context due error 'Post not found on-chain. Something went wrong.'
We'll try to debug with polkassembly team soon🙏🏻
Can you add some contextual information please?
For some reason ref 445 is not showing on polkassembly for me so I used subsquare, but apparently they don't sync.
I was however able to access it via direct link, but I am unable to edit the context due error 'Post not found on-chain. Something went wrong.'
We'll try to debug with polkassembly team soon🙏🏻