Untitled Post
2 years ago
Rejected
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (8)
Requested
544.12K DOT
Proposal Failed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (40)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (288)0.0 DOT
Untitled Post
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (8)
Requested
Proposal Failed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (40)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (288)0.0 DOT
Rich has been providing highly nuanced insights on a daily basis in Kusama for the last year and I believe he deserves compensation for all of the work he has provided. His research is critical to understanding things on a high level and is constantly enlivening discussions on all fronts. I will vote AYE because I am biased toward compensating highly loyal individuals, especially ones who ask for retroactive funding. However I think it is quite a big ask and I expect many to believe that it's too much. There's also the question on whether the Treasury should be paying a salary like this. Looking forward to seeing feedback from others!
Just to be clear you're asking for $125,000 based on 211 likes of your forum posts?
@37251a3367fd402f9933fe7b3 to be fair, he's hosted a number of crowdcasts as well.
FWIW, the way I understand this proposal is that he's asking for a W3F Researcher's salary for everything he's done in the ecosystem for the last 365 days. Take it as you will, I personally don't mind throwing him some cash.