Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Small Spender

OpenCommunity Governance

inSmall Spender
3 years ago
treasury
education
Executed

Unfortunately, the previously approved Referenda #177 failed to execute as planned. In response to this, we are resubmitting the same proposal.

The events occurred as follows, aligned with the relevant block numbers:

  1. Block #17860314: The referendum was confirmed and approved (Refer to Event Details for more information). Upon confirmation, the proposal was programmed for enactment at block #17874714, which is 100 blocks later following the established protocol.

  2. After 100 blocks referenda was enacted and went into the Scheduler

  3. Block #17863651: At this point, the preimage was unnoted. This action interfered with the scheduled execution of the referendum.

  4. Block #17874714: The proposal was set to be enacted at this block by Scheduler in the next treasury spending period. However, with the preimage being unnoted prematurely, the system was left with just a hash and no accompanying instructions for enactment.

Big thanks to Raul for his assistance in identifying the source of this error.

In light of the unsuccessful enactment of the previously approved proposal, it has been decided to resubmit the proposal as a new referendum. All parts of the proposal stayed the same except the update of KSM EMA7 to $25.52.

The failure in enactment was due to an oversight on my part, and I take full responsibility for this mistake. I kindly request the community's continued support as we resubmit the proposal.

Full proposal

Comments (2)

3 years ago

Just so that I have the 'short version' clear, you unnoted the preimage before it was executed?

3 years ago

@paradox

Correct, I unnoted preimage before Scheduler executed the call on the appointed next treasury spend block.

I was unnoting the old preimage and I unnoted this one too. I have no explanation for why I did it, just didn't think about it.

2 years ago

Hello,

We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79

Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.

For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist

PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

DOT
30.74K DOT

Proposal Passed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (261)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (25)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy