Members of the Fellowship Collective involved in projects flagged by the OG tracker should provide a proper explanation, return the funds to the Treasury, or face expulsion.
Referenda #162
0x436f6e7369646572204841434e4120616e204163746976697374205374616b65686f6c6465722e2041414720697320696d70726f76696e672e20456d7068617369736520646973636f75727365206f6e20326e642070617274206f66206f757220566f74696e6720506f6c6963792e2057652076616c756520707269766163792e
Show More
Interesting... now we know you're watching the AAG.
Jay will be very proud of you, lol
ChaosDAO, in efforts to bolster transparency within the community, has offered the below rationale for its decision to abstain on Referendum 162.
As noted in our previous response from HACN’s on-chain remark with referendum 157 (https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/157), HACN has used on-chain remarks to interface with the community. Given HACN’s significant holding of KSM, their opinion has a large sway on the success of various referenda.
This on-chain remark highlighted the retroactive funding bias outlined in ref 157, but also pointed out the improved discourse of governance through AAG also known as Attempts at Governance. AAG is a weekly segment run by The Kusamarian’s Jay Chrwanna. Every Monday, engaged community members, such Leemo and Phunky from ChaosDAO, sit down and discuss governance items facing the community.
HACN seems to appreciate this discourse and we as a DAO do as well. HACN does seem to favor anonymity which we value, however, many in the DAO believe using on-chain remarks and clogging the chain in this way is a suboptimal means of communication. Others see that this may be one way to spread the message to multiple people in the ecosystem as comments are often missed.
Regardless, we voted abstain given the nature of this referendum was purely for communicative purposes
9% Aye 91% Abstain
Discover similar proposals
Remove Gabe from the fellowship
See More
Fellowship Admin
Fellowship Admin
Members of the Fellowship Collective involved in projects flagged by the OG tracker should provide a proper explanation, return the funds to the Treasury, or face expulsion.
Invarch failed to provide the first two, so Gabe, a founding member of the team, does not meet the ethical standards required to have a voice in the Fellowship.
TENETS (extract from the fellowship manifesto)
"Members are expected to faithfully uphold the following tenets.
Clarifications to the rules should be in agreement with these tenets. Acting in clear breach of these tenets may be considered by voters as grounds for non-promotion, demotion or, in extreme cases, exclusion from the Fellowship.
(1) Sincerely uphold the interests of Polkadot and avoid actions which clearly work against it.
(2) Respect the philosophy and principles of Polkadot.
(3) Respect the operational procedures, norms and voting conventions of the Fellowship.
(4) Respect your fellow Members and the wider community"
See More
KSM RFP #1 - Shielded Kusama Hub Transfers - $50k Total Prize!
See More
Treasurer
Treasurer
This RFP was adapted over several weeks on AAG to turn a treasury proposal in discussion to an RFP with refined scope and oversight.
To apply for the prize pls fill out this form.
Prize Pool: $43,000
Finder’s Fee: $2,000 **
Supervisors: $5,000
Supervisors (Bounty Curators)
- Flipchan
- Byte (Erin)
- James Slusser
Excess or unused funds will be returned to the treasury by Bounty Curators.
Timeline
Monday, March 17 - AAG Discussion & this forum post! ✅
Monday, March 24 - Single-ref Bounty + Curators ✅
4 Weeks after Bounty Funding - Submission Deadline Thursday
July 31 - Project Completion (Pending Kusama Hub Launch)
Project Scope
Smart Contract Development
- A Solidity-based smart contract deployed on Kusama Hub
- ZK enabled for private deposits & withdrawals
- Compatibility with all Kusama Hub assets
User Interface
- Browser-based, mobile-ready UI hosted on IPFS
- Support for: Deposits, Withdrawals, Transfers, XCM Transfers
- Compatible with popular ecosystem wallets (Nova Wallet, Talisman, Subwallet)
Anti-correlation Attack Mitigations:
- Fixed deposit amounts (e.g. 1, 10, 100, 1000 units)
- Batch payouts for withdrawals to multiple users
Interoperability - Ability to receive assets via XCM from any Kusama-connected parachain and transfer them to Kusama Hub for use in shielded pool.
Open-Source Delivery
- All code (smart contracts and UI) published under the MIT license
- Publicly accessible repositories Project updates shared transparently via Polkassembly, Subsquare, or Polkadot Forum from Team with Milestone deliveries
- Developer & User documentation
Milestones
Milestone 1, Initial Pools & Basic UI:
$16,200 USD
1 month
- Tests - Smart contract test
- Smart contract - ZK shielded smart contract with KSM and multi asset support on Westend or Paseo
- Basic UI - A basic UI for interacting with the smart contract
Milestone 2, UI + XCM:
$9,900
1 month
- Tests - tests for all features
- User interface design - UI design
- XCM transfers - XCM transfer assets in UI
- Fixed amount transfer only - Allow fixed amount transfers in the UI
Milestone 3, Mainnet Deployment:
$16,900
1 - 1.5 months
- Contract Migration to Kusama Assethub - Migrate contract from Testnet to Kusama Hub
- Public documentation - Documentation for using Kusama shield and developer integration documentation
- Test - tests for contract
- V1 UI - User tested & something we can be proud of
** re: Finder’s Fee: this payment is set aside to incentivize a broad search for the right implementor. Finder’s Fees are paid out at time of team engagement. Teams that submit themselves can collect their own Finder’s Fee at completion of project.
See More