Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Small Tipper

Untitled Post

inSmall Tipper
3 years ago
Executed

This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post 5GeahrX1xHdJzWDcfP18ZXEHidNYVQCmPvP8RQ852x7DWW42.

Comments (3)

3 years ago

Hey @HACNArtaeeEkA34S5pBTUbHsDenJ51wrJDsp4Q2WkKiFTy7 Please provide information on your proposals to clarify what we're voting on and why. Until then - also NAY here.

3 years ago

#155 is requesting retroactive funding -- You voted Nay #144 pays retroactively for services already delivered -- You voted Nay #150 is requesting funding up front -- You voted Aye Exactly which part(s) of the linked policy are you going to follow?

3 years ago

I wonder about the same thing - this seems more like voting Nay on all content-related stuff rather than deciding whether the proposal asks for retroactive payment or not.

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

DOT
100.00 DOT

Proposal Passed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2026

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy