Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more
Untitled Post
3 years ago
Executed
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post 5GeahrX1xHdJzWDcfP18ZXEHidNYVQCmPvP8RQ852x7DWW42.
Comments (3)
Requested
100.00 DOT
Proposal Passed
Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (140)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (66)0.0 DOT
Hey @HACNArtaeeEkA34S5pBTUbHsDenJ51wrJDsp4Q2WkKiFTy7 Please provide information on your proposals to clarify what we're voting on and why. Until then - also NAY here.
#155 is requesting retroactive funding -- You voted Nay #144 pays retroactively for services already delivered -- You voted Nay #150 is requesting funding up front -- You voted Aye Exactly which part(s) of the linked policy are you going to follow?
I wonder about the same thing - this seems more like voting Nay on all content-related stuff rather than deciding whether the proposal asks for retroactive payment or not.