Hi Paradox,

Yes, thanks for clarifying the typo on that sentence. I meant **submission deposit**.

Dear Paulo,

For clarity, as I assume other readers may have the same concern.

> This new proposal aims to resubmit the Tip previously approved by the community plus (similar to what other proposals did when submitting the replacement proposals) the reimbursement value of the **decision deposit** that was locked in the previous proposal BigTipper #7.

The Decision Deposit on BigTipper was `0.166666665 KSM` according to SubSquare, did you mean Submission Deposit? 


Hey everyone,

As a follow up today I would like to resubmit the [BigTipper #7](https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/referendum/7) previously approved by the community.

This Tip proposal [BigTipper #7](https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/referendum/7) was submitted for MathCrypto by me, related to his work on the batch delegate [webpage](https://backend-opengov.math-crypto.com). The Tip was submitted through OpenGov at a time where OpenGov was just kicking off in Kusama with a submission deposit (non-refundable) very high (100 KSM). 

Like other proposals submitted around the same time, the enactment period was erroneous set. Because of that, the proposal was one of the recently cancelled by [Referendum #122](https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/referendum/122).

This new proposal aims to resubmit the Tip previously approved by the community plus (similar to what other proposals did when submitting the replacement proposals) the reimbursement value of the submission deposit that was locked in the previous proposal [BigTipper #7](https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/referendum/7).

This proposal is made of a batch call with two treasury spend calls:

1. 5 KSM related to the value of the original Tip with beneficiary MathCrypto.
2. 100 KSM related to the reimbursement of the submission deposit with beneficiary TurboFlakes.

Thank you for your votes and please feel free to leave your comments below.

Best,

paulo // turboflakes.io

Send a batch of dispatch calls.
Unlike `batch`, it allows errors and won't interrupt.

May be called from any origin except `None`.

- `calls`: The calls to be dispatched from the same origin. The number of call must not
  exceed the constant: `batched_calls_limit` (available in constant metadata).

If origin is root then the calls are dispatch without checking origin filter. (This
includes bypassing `frame_system::Config::BaseCallFilter`).

# <weight>
- Complexity: O(C) where C is the number of calls to be batched.
# </weight>

#139 Resubmission of previous proposal [BigTipper #7]