#160 Motion 160: MoveClaim for issues with Multisig
This motion moves a KSM allocation to a new address as requested by the owner. The entity contacted the Web3 Foundation for not being able to claim their KSM allocation due to using a Gnosis Multisig wallet back in 2017 for the crowdsale: the problem was they were unable to sign messages from the Multisig in order to claim the allocation.
After verification, they worked with W3F to move DOT and KSM claims to a new ETH address. This motion will allow to overwrite the entry in the claims module so the KSM claim can finally happen. Please vote on the motion at your convenience.
Show More
Overall 100 % of users are feeling neutral. The text discusses concerns about the legitimacy of a proposal to access locked funds on DOTs and suggests that more solid proof should be provided publicly. The author hopes those who voted for it have better information, but expresses disappointment in the lack of transparency. They also mention a bug report related to Polkadot assembly and highlight the need for cryptographic proofs from multi-signature owners.
AI-generated from comments
It will be helpful to see some cryptographic proofs. Something like signatures from the multi sign owners proofing the new addresses.
For next reader, this is the multi sign address and we can see it is a multi sign wallet smart contract which indeed cannot sign messages. https://etherscan.io/address/0xd665d007e518f7db66810c06aec94ce80f1dc777#code
Bug report for polkassembly, double click the old address also highlights "new" and causing me copying wrong address at my first attempt.
Yes, I think the only concern regarding such a proposal is to ensure it is 200% legit. Some public proofs would be nice indeed as @xlc mentioned.
Proof of ownership of original Ethereum address requested by W3F: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x73ffe4cf08d2dbaa0fff1f9146fb03edb8be5fc9307ee81dc4d82c9b30716ca8
I am happy that the rightful owner of a DOTs get to access locked funds but I find the proofs provided here very 'light'. Hopefully those who voted this to pass have more solid information, I just wished it would have been shared a bit more publicly.
Discover similar proposals
