Dear council,

I would like to propose a tip for VisionStake's medium article found at the link below:

- [https://visionstake.medium.com/how-to-staking-and-select-the-best-polkadot-or-kusama-validators-b772757dd1b0](https://visionstake.medium.com/how-to-staking-and-select-the-best-polkadot-or-kusama-validators-b772757dd1b0)

The article covers all the salient aspects of nomination and delves further by discussing good selection criteria.

VisionStake's id can be associated with the article at the end "Kusama Node 1".

Regards,

0x466f722050617261636861696e205265706f7274202850726f6772616d61203129202f2f204d6f6f6e7269766572206e6f20736567756e646f20536c6f742c2053686964656e2065204b68616c6120646973707574616e646f20636f7261c3a7c3b56573212068747470733a2f2f796f7574752e62652f327446484449675f586b63

- **Problem Statement:** Lack of clear nomination and validator selection criteria for Polkadot and Kusama stakeholders.
- **Significance:** Enhancing stakeholder understanding and decision-making in staking for Polkadot and Kusama networks.
- **Proposed Solution:** Provide clear nomination and validator selection criteria in the VisionStake medium article "Kusama Node 1."
- **Expected Outcomes:** Improved stakeholder engagement and informed decision-making in staking activities.

For a medium article on nominating and selection criteria for good validators

No Active Proposals