Previously, the [#129](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referendum/129) referendum proposal has been passed and is in the dispatch queue. Still, after the Bifrost team tested it, it was found that if the total weight of XCM messages in a single block exceeds `ump_service_total_weight`, they will be discarded, resulting in a loss of funds. 

Fortunately, the original value of `ump_service_total_weight` is `100_000_000_000`; there are not enough XCM messages to trigger this issue. However, if proposal [#129](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referendum/129) is executed, `ump_service_total_weight` will be reduced to `5_000_000_000`. Thus there will be a high probability of triggering hidden issues, so Bifrost proposes to cancel the implementation of the proposal [#129](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referendum/129). Before the final conclusion, in order to minimize the harm, Bifrost proposed this referendum proposal to readjust `ump_service_total_weight` to `100_000_000_000`, Fortunately, the proposal [#129](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referendum/129) has been revoked by the council through motion, so this proposal (#133) no longer needs to be executed. It can be rejected, thanks to everyone.

Thanks to the Acala team for cooperating with the test, and related [issues](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/3782) have been raised for repair.

Expect Chaos

 Sets the soft limit for the phase of dispatching dispatchable upward messages.

- There was a problem with a proposal called [#129](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referendum/129) that could cause a loss of funds.
- The problem was discovered and the proposal was cancelled.
- Another proposal called [#133](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referendum/133) was made to fix the problem, but it is no longer needed.
- The Acala team helped with testing and raised issues to fix the problem.
- Everything is okay now and the problem has been resolved.

#133 Referendum can be rejected

No Active Proposals