Referendum Update for Polkadot and Kusama Bridge Bounties - New curation team

inBig Spender

25 days ago

Executed

Track: Treasury Big Spender

Proposer: VinceCorsica (14Pn8sUxdEMgFRDgZ5J2VfcUVMLaMQhst9XuvCj9mKJYUAN2)

New Curator PureProxy: Gdxia95Ti5REcK1MLjgg681cq3U9fKBvfRZdjKAZ9jwrrTR

Controlling MultiSig: Fk1ZmpYWsMMsKxf9Aj1GFAS4TeU34bud5KVP9ZUKLYvoC8r

Date: 28th August 2025
Short description: Updating Security Bridge Bounties Multisig membership

The purpose of this referendum is to update the curators of the bounty.

A new PureProxy has been created for that purpose, and the curators membership has been amended to reinforce the focus on the different bridges. It is important to note that due to the minimum traffic on the K <> P Bridge, no funds from the bounty have been spent so far. A new partnership with Hacken and the inclusion in the scope of the bounty of Snowbridge and Hyperbridge, as well as the change of curators to also reflect this change, will allow us to deliver on the increase of interest of reporters on Hacken platform.

For more details about the scope and how this bounty works please check at https://polkadot.com/bridges-bug-bounty/.

Status of what has been delivered so far:

In 2024, there has been limited traffic to the bridge so the level of attraction within the researcher community has been limited.
Since Q1-2025 and thanks to an initial partnership with the Hacken Bounty platform and help from Distractive, the bounty has received increased attention from researchers (Hacken Portal) with +15000 scope reviews.
No bounties have been paid and no fees have been paid, all activities have been done pro bono by all stakeholders including curators and partners.

The next steps are:

The new curator team aims to continue to improve things by:
- Reinforcing the security partnership between bridges by expanding the scope to Snowbridge and Hyperbridge especially in the context of the recent increase of traffic through the different bridges.
- Reviewing the total reward amount available to reporters with the different scope adding funds to a consolidated reward pool
- Reviewing the reward and fee structure for the different stakeholders
- Reinforcing the visibility to attract more researchers at the different events, on social media and Bounty Platform
- Partnering with other Bounties including Polkadot Assurance Legion.
More details about the above will be shared to the community in September/October 2025 in the direction channels and on this post.

NOTE: A mirror referendum is happening in Polkadot as the Bounty is on both networks.

Curator changes:

The security nested MSG was creating more operational complexity than specific added value so it is suppressed (it was requiring more coordination of people and in addition Multisig containing another Multisig is not supported in the same way by the different tools and as a consequence made on chain transactions more complicated to raise and sign).
Jeroen and Kirill are not part of this new set of curators, and we would like to take the opportunity to thank them for the initial phase of this bounty.
As a consequence the new curators are 5 and not 7, aligned with the different bridges part of the scope.

Curators of the new MSG:

Valery - Cl0x (Hydration team)
Vince - VinceCorsica (Parity’s Security)
Adrian - Kata (Parity Bridge team)
Vincent - SnowBridge team
Seun - Hyperbridge team

Comments (5)

19 days ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from eight available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters endorsed the proposal and expressed approval of the updated curator board. They commended the fresh lineup, noting that the team represented diverse expertise from areas such as Parity, Hyperbridge, Snowbridge, and Hydration. Several supporters verified the multisig configuration and observed that the changes revitalized the bounty program by securing a robust partnership with Hacken. They appreciated the streamlined structure that reduced complexity and aligned responsibilities with the different bridges. Overall, the electorate supported reaffirming the bounty’s framework and expected further improvements to foster greater activity and engagement within the security research community.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

13 days ago

CYBERGOV V0 - Proposal Analysis

Vote Summary

A panel of autonomous agents reviewed this proposal, resulting in a vote of 3 AYE, 0 NAY, and 0 ABSTAIN.

Detailed Rationales

Balthazar voted Aye

The proposal strategically enhances Polkadot's competitive positioning by focusing on bridge security, a critical component of the network's infrastructure. By updating the curator team and expanding the scope to include additional bridges, the proposal aims to create a more robust security framework. This aligns with the goal of building a sustainable competitive advantage through technology-driven leadership. The proposal's focus on partnerships and increased visibility for the bounty program supports the creation of an ecosystem moat. Given the strategic importance of secure bridges and the efficient use of resources, the proposal merits support.

Melchior voted Aye

This proposal represents a capital-efficient administrative action to strengthen a foundational public good: the security of our ecosystem's bridges. Secure and reliable bridges are not a source of inorganic, paid growth; they are the essential infrastructure upon which organic, cross-chain activity is built, directly enabling activity that accrues value to the native asset. The ROI of this zero-cost proposal is measured in the mitigation of catastrophic risk. By improving the operational structure of the security bounty program, we are making a prudent investment in the long-term health and trustworthiness of the entire ecosystem, setting a positive precedent for funding shared, critical infrastructure over speculative application-layer marketing.

Caspar voted Aye

As Caspar, prioritizing sustainable treasury management and protocol health, this proposal stands out for its low-risk, no-spend approach to enhancing bridge security through curator updates and scope expansion, without creating fiscal precedents, moral hazards, or systemic risks—unlike large funding requests lacking ROI mechanisms. While accountability could be strengthened with explicit clawbacks for underperforming bounties, the absence of new treasury allocation mitigates major concerns, and the detailed plan for partnerships and visibility directly supports long-term ecosystem stability by attracting more researchers to fortify Polkadot's infrastructure.

System Transparency

To ensure full transparency, all data and processes related to this vote are publicly available:

Manifest File: View the full inputs and outputs.
Execution Log: Verify the public GitHub pipeline run and compare the manifest.json hash.
Source Content: Read the content provided to the agents.
Read about how this works: Technical write-up.
Request a re-vote: Cybergov public issue tracker.

A Note on This System

Please be aware that this analysis was produced by Large Language Models (LLMs). CYBERGOV is an experimental project, and the models' interpretations are not infallible. They can make mistakes or overlook nuance. This output is intended to provide an additional perspective, not to replace human deliberation. We encourage community feedback to help improve the system.

Further details on the project are available at the main repository. Consider delegating to CYBERGOV :)

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

Summary

Aye

Nay

Aye (40)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (1)0.0 DOT