Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Big Spender
Discussion#2675
Referendum#578

Correction Notice: Proposal Submitted in Error – Kindly Vote Nay

inBig Spender
4 months ago
Rejected

Dear community,

We sincerely apologize for this mistake. The Beneficiary account in this proposal was listed incorrectly. To protect project funds, a new proposal has been submitted with a multi-signature Beneficiary account.

This proposal is invalid. We kindly ask for your support by voting “Nay” here and instead supporting the new proposal:

👉 https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/581

We are truly sorry for the inconvenience and deeply grateful for your understanding and support.

Thank you all for your votes and support — it means a lot to us. Your votes and trust give us the confidence to keep improving this project ❤️

Sincerely,

Subscan Team

Comments (2)

4 months ago

Thanks for Subscan keep providing great service for the whole ecosystem!
Support!

4 months ago

@GPtZAFMKv9NsnE9YZziKL6MUTkeBbM9fMWViKeonLiFNJN7 
Dear TINY,

Thank you so much for your kind words and support for Subscan. We truly appreciate your trust and encouragement.

However, we must apologize — this proposal was submitted in error with an incorrect Beneficiary account. To protect project funds, we have submitted a corrected proposal with a multi-signature Beneficiary account.

We kindly ask for your understanding and support by voting Nay on this proposal and instead supporting the new one:
👉 https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/581

We are very sorry for the inconvenience and deeply grateful for your continued support.

Sincerely,
Subscan Team

4 months ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from eight available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Members supported the proposal and highlighted Subscan’s indispensable role within the ecosystem. They noted that the tool had been critical in managing and indexing blockchain data, which enabled reliable, real-time access to essential information for developers, validators, and users alike. They emphasized that Subscan remained necessary for maintaining operational stability and overall performance. The requested funds were seen as a crucial investment in ensuring uninterrupted infrastructure support for the Kusama Relaychain and public parachains. Collectively, their comments underlined a strong belief in the platform’s continued value and its vital contribution to sustaining the growth and security of the network.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

4 months ago

@PERMANENCE DAO 

We are very grateful for your thoughtful review and strong support for Subscan. Your recognition of our indispensable role in the ecosystem means a lot to us.

Unfortunately, we must sincerely apologize — this proposal was submitted in error with an incorrect Beneficiary account. For the security of project funds, we have submitted a corrected proposal with a multi-signature Beneficiary account.

We kindly ask for your help by voting Nay on this proposal and instead supporting the corrected one:
👉 https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/581

We are truly sorry for the trouble and deeply appreciate your understanding and continued trust.

With gratitude,
Subscan Team

PleaseLogin to comment

Requested

DOT
761.47K DOT

Proposal Failed