Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Whitelisted Caller
Decision Deposit Placed

[Whitelisted Caller] Register CurioDAO ERC-20 token on Kusama AssetHub

inWhitelisted Caller
14 days ago

Registers CurioDAOs ERC-20 on Kusama AssetHub as a foreign token, so that the token can be bridged from Ethereum to Polkadot AssetHub, to Kusama AssetHub.

Link to ERC-20: https://etherscan.io/address/0x0e186357c323c806c1efdad36d217f7a54b63d18

Comments (2)

6 days ago

We raise the following questions concerning this ref:

  • Who controls the address (0x44F0D89A9e4e709fda50B0D4e88874Cc6C3397d0) that receives the entire 100,000,000 token allocation at deployment?
  • What governance safeguards have been implemented in this new token system to prevent potential voting power manipulation?
  • Will there be an airdrop of CGT2.0 tokens to original CGT token holders? If so, what distribution mechanisms will be implemented?
  • What will the CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) token be used for beyond just the contract code? How does it relate to any compensation plans referenced in public reports?
  • What are the token distribution plans and how will the initial allocation be used?
  • What additional contracts might interact with this token?
  • What technical features does CGT2.0 include to address potential governance vulnerabilities?
  • Has the contract undergone external security audits, and if so, by whom?
  • What governance controls are in place to prevent potential security issues in the future?
  • What is the relationship, if any, between this CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) and the Substrate-based JAMTON project referenced on parachains.info?
  • How does this CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) token relate to the stTON token also mentioned in connection with JAMTON?
  • Why wasn't any potential connection between CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) and JAMTON included in the proposal?
  • What's the relationship between the existing Curio Chain parachain's CGT token and the proposed CGT2.0 token?
  • How do the existing ~30M CGT tokens on the Kusama parachain relate to the new 100M tokens?
  • What is the relationship between this new CGT2.0 token and the previous Curio tokens referenced in public reports from March 2024?

We're publishing these questions because we believe transparent answers would help voters make fully informed decisions. With limited time remaining in the voting period, we hope these questions contribute to community due diligence.

We welcome responses from the proposer, other experts, and community members who may have relevant information.

4 days ago

@Colorful Notion I have asked CurioDAO to respond to your questions.

I would like to highlight that the token is already registered on Polkadot, and all this proposal does is to register the token on Kusama too. This is to allow bridging the token between Polkadot and Kusama, which is used for integration and dApp testing with CurioDAO.

PleaseLogin to comment

Voting has Started

2

of 3

Decision Period

25 / 28 days

Confirmation Period

0 / 10 minutes

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (48)0.0 PAS

Support0.0 PAS

Nay (5)0.0 PAS

Comments (2)

6 days ago

We raise the following questions concerning this ref:

  • Who controls the address (0x44F0D89A9e4e709fda50B0D4e88874Cc6C3397d0) that receives the entire 100,000,000 token allocation at deployment?
  • What governance safeguards have been implemented in this new token system to prevent potential voting power manipulation?
  • Will there be an airdrop of CGT2.0 tokens to original CGT token holders? If so, what distribution mechanisms will be implemented?
  • What will the CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) token be used for beyond just the contract code? How does it relate to any compensation plans referenced in public reports?
  • What are the token distribution plans and how will the initial allocation be used?
  • What additional contracts might interact with this token?
  • What technical features does CGT2.0 include to address potential governance vulnerabilities?
  • Has the contract undergone external security audits, and if so, by whom?
  • What governance controls are in place to prevent potential security issues in the future?
  • What is the relationship, if any, between this CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) and the Substrate-based JAMTON project referenced on parachains.info?
  • How does this CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) token relate to the stTON token also mentioned in connection with JAMTON?
  • Why wasn't any potential connection between CurioGasToken (CGT2.0) and JAMTON included in the proposal?
  • What's the relationship between the existing Curio Chain parachain's CGT token and the proposed CGT2.0 token?
  • How do the existing ~30M CGT tokens on the Kusama parachain relate to the new 100M tokens?
  • What is the relationship between this new CGT2.0 token and the previous Curio tokens referenced in public reports from March 2024?

We're publishing these questions because we believe transparent answers would help voters make fully informed decisions. With limited time remaining in the voting period, we hope these questions contribute to community due diligence.

We welcome responses from the proposer, other experts, and community members who may have relevant information.

4 days ago

@Colorful Notion I have asked CurioDAO to respond to your questions.

I would like to highlight that the token is already registered on Polkadot, and all this proposal does is to register the token on Kusama too. This is to allow bridging the token between Polkadot and Kusama, which is used for integration and dApp testing with CurioDAO.

PleaseLogin to comment

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy