Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Wish For Change

WFC: Agree that coretime is not a viable revenue model for Kusama and encourage the development of radical new approaches for burning KSM and alternative mechanisms for accruing value to the canarys treasury account as part of the move to becoming a free-thinking cousin of Polkadot.

inWish For Change
2 months ago
Timed Out

Why this WFC?

Kusama was marketed as a project that aimed to challenge established thinking.

It's time to dogfood that claim, by challenging its own accepted wisdom.

Overview

Coretime is Kusama's primary product, exposing computational resources initially to parachains and now to applications building on the network through contracts on Asset Hub.

As noted in WFC 539 Kusama Asset Hub aims to become the centre of economic activity on the network, however as a system chain, it does not purchase coretime and therefore will not contribute to burning KSM throught the consumption of coretime.

In the absence of public demand from Asset Hub, demand (and thus burn) must be stimulated by private market consumers of coretime.

RFC 0149

The enactment of RFC 0149 aims to course correct current issues with the design of coretime sales that have led to the hoarding of cores.

Although it reworks the current mechanism it also acknowledges:

This RFC should solve the immediate problems we are seeing in production right now. Longer term, improvements to the market in terms of price discovery (RFC-17) should be considered, especially once demand grows.

An unsustainable economy

We posit that the coretime experiment should be seen as a useful resource, but deprioritised as a near or even medium term strategy for sustaining the current Kusama economy.

Time for alternatives

in addition to accepting the limitations of coretime, this WFC aims to also encourage alternative and perhaps more radical proposals for burning KSM and building a diversified and productive treasury reserve.

Comments (2)

2 months ago

Coretime has never been designed to be a viable revenue model, nor for Kusama neither Polkadot.
No one from the builders who designed it never said such a thing.
Some random lost guys in the community who believed Coretime will make DOT/KSM pump by burning millions of DOT/KSM raised that point, and only them.

So Coretime shouldn't even be mentioned in this WFC.
What are the new approaches and mechanisms you are talking about? You don't even bring a single detailed solution...

So please, can you stop spamming OpenGov?
You're starting to be really really tiring.

If you want open discussions and brainstorm about solutions, use the Polkadot forum.

2 months ago

PolkaWorld votes NAY

WFC proposals should come with concrete solutions — not just vague directions or spur-of-the-moment ideas.
We recommend that proposals like this be first shared on the Polkadot forum to gather community feedback, and only then refined into actionable, well-structured WFC submissions.

Read all feedback here.

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Failed

2

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (3)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (18)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy