Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Wish For Change

Please read https://a16zcrypto.com/posts/article/end-foundation-era-crypto/

inWish For Change
7 months ago
Timed Out

Proponents argue that foundations offer better alignment with tokenholders because foundations lack shareholders and can focus exclusively on maximizing network value.

But this theory overlooks how organizations actually function. Removing the equity-based incentives of corporations doesn’t eliminate misalignment — it often institutionalizes it. Without a profit motive, foundations lack clear feedback loops, direct accountability, and market-enforced discipline. The foundation funding model is one of patronage: Tokens are allocated and then sold for fiat, and that capital is spent without a clear mechanism to tie expenditures to outcomes.

People spending other people’s money, with minimal accountability, rarely optimize for impact.

...

A better, simpler alternative: Companies

https://rfc.decent.partners/t/mint-7-040-870-kab-to-decent-partners/73

This proposal aligns to ongoing work to create a legal and technical structure that links existing Kabocha tokens to equity or equity-like rights in Decent Partners Ltd potentially with programmable features, while ensuring compliance with existing and emerging regulations.

The primary aim is to iterate towards a model where tokens are bearer assets - representing legally enforceable rights/obligations in the Decent Partners network public company.

Comments (3)

7 months ago

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Wish For Change track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received zero aye and six nay votes from ten available members, with one member abstaining.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

6 months ago

We have voted Nay on this proposal. We don’t believe that submitting a referendum on this track is the most effective way to achieve your goals.

If the intention was to gather community sentiment, we recommend using more appropriate channels such as voting.opensquare.io (https://voting.opensquare.io/), the Polkadot forum, and social platforms where deeper discussion can take place. These are better suited to building consensus before moving into governance.

You can view how we evaluated your proposal here

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Failed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2026

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy