Overview: Traditional discussion forums, Telegram, Discord, and social media platforms like X (Twitter) fall short in fostering effective and transparent OpenGov debates. These platforms often lack structured debate features, suffer from off-topic discussions, and fail to provide clear visualization of arguments, leading to fragmented and inefficient conversations.
Problem Statement: Current platforms present several issues:
<ul>
<li>Traditional Forums: Lack structured debate tools, make following complex arguments difficult, and struggle with scalability.</li>
<li>Social Media: Fragmented discussions, echo chambers, rapid pace inhibiting in-depth responses, misinformation risks, and inadequate moderation.</li>
</ul>
Proposed Solution: We propose a new discussion forum with features designed to enhance transparency and effectiveness:
<ul>
<li>Structured Debates: Logical organization of arguments with interactive tree structures and easy pro/con identification.</li>
<li>Enhanced Navigation: Features for efficient exploration and tracking debate evolution.</li>
<li>In-Depth Analysis: Tools for argument evaluation, consensus highlighting, and source integration.</li>
<li>Q&amp;A and Compromise: Dynamic Q&amp;A sections, real-time voting, and interactive compromise suggestions for collaborative problem-solving.</li>
<li>Compromise&amp;Agreements: Tools for suggesting and evaluating compromises facilitate collaborative problem-solving, benefiting the negotiation process.</li>
<li>Proposal Review: Structured layouts for analyzing outcomes, impact assessments, and risk intelligence.</li>
<li>Analytics Dashboard: Real-time updates on argument strength and community focus.</li>
<li>Timeline Slider: Visualize argument development and discussion shifts over time.</li>
<li>Chat Functionality: Direct chat options for discussing arguments in real-time.</li>
</ul>
Benefits: This platform will streamline discussions, prevent misinformation, enhance transparency, and encourage meaningful engagement by integrating diverse opinions and structured analysis tools. It aims to build a more informed and participative OpenGov community.
complete proposal can be found <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1C33bsdvngicUls1wBL3eReT-gvBDvvDK/view?usp=sharing">here</a>
Update 05.08.2024: Please see the <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rSXpJhSkydpiEwCB1Q_IQoKy8gKYD6mA/view">20 Min MVP video </a>with explanations to the proposal.
Update 26.08.2024: Please see the <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P4XCc2h_FKAMrOWmQO2qYckC9ANAaxBK/view" target="_blank" rel="noopener">13 min Proposal Review video</a>, of how the discussions could look like.
Thank you.

- Problem Statement: Current platforms lack structured debate tools, struggle with scalability, and foster fragmented discussions, echo chambers, and misinformation risks.
- Significance: Inefficient conversations hinder effective OpenGov debates and transparency.
- Proposed Solution: Introduce a new discussion forum with structured debates, enhanced navigation, in-depth analysis tools, Q&A sections, compromise suggestions, proposal review layouts, analytics dashboard, timeline slider, and chat functionality.
- Expected Outcomes: Streamlined discussions, prevention of misinformation, enhanced transparency, and meaningful engagement fostering an informed and participative OpenGov community.

#433 OpenGov Argumentree: improve decision quality

No Active Proposals