Opening the Kappa Sigma Mu parameters to OpenGov makes sense to me. I would vote Aye on a Wish-for-change for that. However, adding an additional "Stream" track or specifying specific teams to implement it, though, seems to be over-specifying the solution. I also think "what to do with the pot" and "where this could go" are two additional complications that shouldn't be a part of a single Wish-for-change Referendum. In general, I think Wish-for-change requests should be very focused or the result of an agreement that has already been reached by community consensus. Was there previous discussion on this somewhere else?

What makes you think it's acceptable to force-transfer society's funds? These funds should be controlled solely by the members of Kappa Sigma Mu. Last I checked, it's open for anyone to join and gain voting power within the society. Members are free to write and propose code to enable the society to manage its pot through its own voting/level system. fine if you want to halt the spending burn directed towards the society, but force-transferring funds from other network participants is just plain braindead. how many votes you need to lose to drop this?