Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Big Spender

CURATORS PROPOSAL FOR BOUNTY 27 - POLKADOT <> KUSAMA BRIDGE SECURITY BUGBOUNTY

inBig Spender
2 years ago
Executed

This referendum proposes the Curators for bounty 27 – Bounty Proposal for Polkadot <> Kusama Bridge Security Bug Bounty. Please review the bounty and previous referendum which funded this bounty for more info.
The curators are responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of the different phases and for the attribution of the reward to the bug bounty reporter. To ensure the successful implementation of this bounty, the curators are bringing diverse forms of expertise.
More details about the curators and key activities attached

Comments (4)

2 years ago

Alzymologist Oy Decentralized voice

We abstain in this, as well as corresponding previous proposal for bounty 27, for this is clearly a conflict of interests.

2 years ago

I like the selection here. A few questions:

  • why is there an indicated "keyless account" which is "TBC?" What purpose will it serve?
  • why is the curator fee 0 KSM when you indicate that the curator fee is 5% of the bounty? Shouldn't the fee be 255.1 KSM?

2 years ago

@Adam_Clay_Steeber 

I'm going to vote NAY until these questions are addressed. There's a disconnect between the proposal and what I see on chain which is concerning to me.

Load more comments
PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (164)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (1)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy