#223 For 7 Kusama treasury proposal Audits

Proposer:

HBtJ...1hJs

in Democracy

Beneficiary:

(31.07 KSM)

19th Jun '23

(Edited)

Description

AI Summary

Votes Bubble

Timeline

Evaluation

On Chain Info

Stats

Dear Kusama community,

This proposal was opened 8 days ago for discussion here

As a sequel to my onboarding as a proposal auditor, (whose referendum was passed here), I’ve conducted audits on a regular basis for Kusama proposals. Some of these audits were in the discussion phase, with others being in the referendum phase.

This proposal request for the funding of these audit reports using the rate of $50/hour for 2 hours in each proposal. This is in accordance with the OpenCommunity Governance referenda which got passed here.

Since the onboarding period, a total of 9 high-quality audits were made on Kusama treasury proposals. These audits were made using the proposal audit template provided by Referendum 67 and can be found in table 1 of this proposal's document.

These audits including all previous audits can also be tracked here.

However, to ensure that this proposal sticks to the “tipper” tracks of the on-chain treasury, only 7 audits will be rewarded at this time.

More information including the list of the audits for whom a tip is requested can be found in the proposal document..

Thank you!

Users are saying...

Based on all comments and replies

Overall 50 % of users are feeling optimistic. We are seeking feedback from teams about their experience with treasury proposals and exploring a service that could assist them in crafting successful ones. We kindly ask for your input by filling out the form at https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79, sharing as much detail as you're comfortable with to help us assess our potential services. For more information, follow OpenGovAssist on Twitter: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist.

Overall 50 % of users are feeling against it. The speaker disagrees with audits as they do not add value to the process, preferring other efforts like improving SubSquare or Polkassembly by the audit team. They believe these audits are inconsequential and centralized, making work for treasury payments. However, respect is given to the overall contributions of Abdulbee in the ecosystem.

AI-generated from comments

HqRc...fVZn

20th Jun '23

(Edited)

Voted Abstain

Hey Abdulbee,

I am not in favour of these audits as I don't believe they're adding any value to the process. There are other efforts that the audit team is doing that I think add value like improving SubSquare or Polkassembly.

The audits remain imo, inconsequential and centralized. It is making work to be paid by the treasury.

With that said, there is a respect for the work that you've done in the ecosystem generally and that this is a fairly small ask. Tom has already set the vote in favour and I'll leave it at that and abstain.

HUj6...GLD6

13th Aug '23

Hello,

We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79

Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.

For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist

Discover similar proposals

#515

EG8Q...ATcw

Submitted