For 7 Kusama treasury proposal Audits
Beneficiary:Dear Kusama community,
This proposal was opened 8 days ago for discussion here
As a sequel to my onboarding as a proposal auditor, (whose referendum was passed here), I’ve conducted audits on a regular basis for Kusama proposals. Some of these audits were in the discussion phase, with others being in the referendum phase.
This proposal request for the funding of these audit reports using the rate of $50/hour for 2 hours in each proposal. This is in accordance with the OpenCommunity Governance referenda which got passed here.
Since the onboarding period, a total of 9 high-quality audits were made on Kusama treasury proposals. These audits were made using the proposal audit template provided by Referendum 67 and can be found in table 1 of this proposal's document.
These audits including all previous audits can also be tracked here.
However, to ensure that this proposal sticks to the “tipper” tracks of the on-chain treasury, only 7 audits will be rewarded at this time.
More information including the list of the audits for whom a tip is requested can be found in the proposal document..
Thank you!
Comments (2)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (170)0.0 PAS
Support0.0 PAS
Nay (35)0.0 PAS
Comments (2)
Hey Abdulbee, I am not in favour of these audits as I don't believe they're adding any value to the process. There are other efforts that the audit team is doing that I think add value like improving SubSquare or Polkassembly. The audits remain imo, inconsequential and centralized. It is making work to be paid by the treasury. With that said, there is a respect for the work that you've done in the ecosystem generally and that this is a fairly small ask. Tom has already set the vote in favour and I'll leave it at that and abstain.
Hello,
We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79
Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.
For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist
Hey Abdulbee, I am not in favour of these audits as I don't believe they're adding any value to the process. There are other efforts that the audit team is doing that I think add value like improving SubSquare or Polkassembly. The audits remain imo, inconsequential and centralized. It is making work to be paid by the treasury. With that said, there is a respect for the work that you've done in the ecosystem generally and that this is a fairly small ask. Tom has already set the vote in favour and I'll leave it at that and abstain.
Hello,
We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79
Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.
For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist