Members of the Fellowship Collective involved in projects flagged by the OG tracker should provide a proper explanation, return the funds to the Treasury, or face expulsion.
Back to Big Tipper
Rejected
#184 Tip for Polkabeat: Measuring the decentralization of Parachains
Description
AI Summary
Votes Bubble
Timeline
Evaluation
On Chain Info
Stats
Description: This is a tip to reward the efforts of Phil (https://twitter.com/ph_lux) for creating the Polkabeat platform.
Polkabeat website / intro: https://polkabeat.org/2023/04/24/introducing-polkabeat/ Polkabeat Twitter: https://twitter.com/polkabeat_org
Show More
Please Log In to comment
3Comments
33%
0%
67%
0%
0%
Coinstudio
Hey Leemo, Naying this dt wrong extrinsic
treasury.proposeSpend -> treasury.spend
Leemo
I guess that's what we get for doing it live :D Thanks for the feedback! Also I see HACN has re-issued it with the correct extrinsic hehe
HjcE...v9Ae
Hello there,
I will be voting nay on this.
I do think that the remark is slightly confusing because it gives the impression that it is AAG that is tipping Polkabeat, meanwhile AAG is merely PROPOSING a tip in favour of Polkabeat to be paid out by the Community treasury.
It would be good if proponents could refrain from instrumentalising the Community treasury for their own publicity/marketing/promotional ends.
Thank you.
Jay Chrawnna
AAG is a volunteer, community platform for governance discourse, examination, and open fumbling with new social tech.
Its aim is to publicize, market, and promote the governance model itself while providing a public forum for those attempting treasury funding.
This well deserved tip proposal was presented as an educational opportunity and the slightly confusing remark was decided Live and in the moment. In context the proposing is the the act of gratitude, not the reward.
As this weekly, live program is free and open to all, anyone is welcome and encouraged to join and shape the discourse.
HjcE...v9Ae
@447368856cec4afcae909c71d In that case, it would be good if AAG's volunteer educators could thoroughly educate themselves about the ins-and-out of on-chain Treasury processes before dispensing their lessons to the wider community. Web3 education isn't something that can be improvised in the spur of the moment for uninformed onlookers, even more so during a bear market.
Jay Chrawnna
uh oh...
Anyway, here's a thread of clips from this week where 9 governance users got to share their project and face scrutiny in front of a live audience for anyone interested.
HUj6...GLD6
Hello,
We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79
Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.
For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist
Discover similar proposals
#509
Jay Chrawnna
Deciding
KSM RFP #1 - Shielded Kusama Hub Transfers - $50k Total Prize!
See More
Treasurer
Treasurer
#509 KSM RFP #1 - Shielded Kusama Hub Transfers - $50k Total Prize!
Jay Chrawnna
This RFP was adapted over several weeks on AAG to turn a treasury proposal in discussion to an RFP with refined scope and oversight.
To apply for the prize pls fill out this form.
Prize Pool: $43,000
Finder’s Fee: $2,000 **
Supervisors: $5,000
Supervisors (Bounty Curators)
- Flipchan
- Byte (Erin)
- James Slusser
Excess or unused funds will be returned to the treasury by Bounty Curators.
Timeline
Monday, March 17 - AAG Discussion & this forum post! ✅
Monday, March 24 - Single-ref Bounty + Curators ✅
4 Weeks after Bounty Funding - Submission Deadline Thursday
July 31 - Project Completion (Pending Kusama Hub Launch)
Project Scope
Smart Contract Development
- A Solidity-based smart contract deployed on Kusama Hub
- ZK enabled for private deposits & withdrawals
- Compatibility with all Kusama Hub assets
User Interface
- Browser-based, mobile-ready UI hosted on IPFS
- Support for: Deposits, Withdrawals, Transfers, XCM Transfers
- Compatible with popular ecosystem wallets (Nova Wallet, Talisman, Subwallet)
Anti-correlation Attack Mitigations:
- Fixed deposit amounts (e.g. 1, 10, 100, 1000 units)
- Batch payouts for withdrawals to multiple users
Interoperability - Ability to receive assets via XCM from any Kusama-connected parachain and transfer them to Kusama Hub for use in shielded pool.
Open-Source Delivery
- All code (smart contracts and UI) published under the MIT license
- Publicly accessible repositories Project updates shared transparently via Polkassembly, Subsquare, or Polkadot Forum from Team with Milestone deliveries
- Developer & User documentation
Milestones
Milestone 1, Initial Pools & Basic UI:
$16,200 USD
1 month
- Tests - Smart contract test
- Smart contract - ZK shielded smart contract with KSM and multi asset support on Westend or Paseo
- Basic UI - A basic UI for interacting with the smart contract
Milestone 2, UI + XCM:
$9,900
1 month
- Tests - tests for all features
- User interface design - UI design
- XCM transfers - XCM transfer assets in UI
- Fixed amount transfer only - Allow fixed amount transfers in the UI
Milestone 3, Mainnet Deployment:
$16,900
1 - 1.5 months
- Contract Migration to Kusama Assethub - Migrate contract from Testnet to Kusama Hub
- Public documentation - Documentation for using Kusama shield and developer integration documentation
- Test - tests for contract
- V1 UI - User tested & something we can be proud of
** re: Finder’s Fee: this payment is set aside to incentivize a broad search for the right implementor. Finder’s Fees are paid out at time of team engagement. Teams that submit themselves can collect their own Finder’s Fee at completion of project.
See More
Deciding
