Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
Chat with KlaraComing Soon
OpenGov
View All Root

Remove lock for Bifrost swapped parachain id (2259 & 2262)

inRoot
2 years ago
referenda
Timed Out

Background

Bifrost is a Kusama parachain that recently completed a lease renewal. We registered two paraids to bid for the lease renewal and then swapped to Bifrost paraid 2001 once the bidding was successful.

Request

We now have two parachains that require community assistance to execute the remove_lock function in order to withdraw the previous 700 KSM locking.

The address we used to register paraid 2259 & paraid 2262: J3dfxSNbUHwBbmB4My7DCgrNniQ227uTUNqqf4KB1DhyZkR

Transactions:

  • 2259 registration: https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/0x90433dd2c428e38104709393a35d41e051c353fb175eeb93d2240fa1aef7f13c

  • 2262 registration: https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/0x0e2ad064d107abe9dca42f6be2f37ec27fa2b2858d847c62af8b87af38ad3975

The signature below is used to prove the registration address (J3dfxSNbUHwBbmB4My7DCgrNniQ227uTUNqqf4KB1DhyZkR) is ours:

Content:
Paraid 2259 & 2262 belong to Bifrost, and Bifrost Kusama slot renewal is successful, we are submitting referendum to unlock paraid 2259 & 2262

Signature:
0xa0e872b0d115e75cf82787693f5b4cce913c1c6666abb4cd5d4a279489d0ae795fc905d36b6d3af11cb65b1ecf66a8294726c52805f374e7ae4fb1ffa30b698e

Comments (2)

2 years ago

Hello, please make sure to include the decision deposit so the proposal can move to decision phase.

profile
ChaosDAO_Referendum_Commission
2 years ago

ChaosDAO, in efforts to bolster transparency within the community, has offered the below rationale for its decision to vote Aye on Referendum 172.

Referendum 172: Remove lock for Bifrost swapped parachain id (2259 & 2262) has been voted Aye by ChaosDAO.

This was unanimously voted Aye by the DAO. It was mentioned that there was very little discussion overall by the community for this but some members of the DAO thought of the removal of this lock being similar in principle to a contentious referendum that was proposed on Polkadot recently to return lost funds to the Polkadot Treasury.

Overall vote:
100% Aye

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Failed

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (280)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (21)0.0 DOT

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy