Back to Big Tipper
OpenGov Referendum#156 >> Treasury Proposal#298
Executed
Requested:
25.00 KSM

Referenda #156

Proposer:
HACN...FTy7
 
in Democracy
Beneficiary:
(25.00 KSM)
12th Apr '23

This is a referendumV2 whose proposer address (HACNArtaeeEkA34S5pBTUbHsDenJ51wrJDsp4Q2WkKiFTy7) is shown in on-chain info below. Only this user can edit this description and the title. If you own this account, login and tell us more about your proposal.

Show More

Proposal Passed

of 3

Summary
Passed
77.2%Aye
AyeNay
22.8%Nay
Ayes(152)
37.64K KSM
Nays(45)
11.10K KSM
Support
39.06K KSM
Issuance
15.93M KSM
Voting Details
Approval0.00%Threshold0.00%
Support0.00%Threshold0.00%
Please Log In to comment
Users are saying...
Based on all comments and replies

Overall 66 % of users are feeling optimistic. Voted Aye for Adam's effort in coming up with a solution for the Treasury. Rock on Adam! Stay updated with OpenGovAssist on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist. Share your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process here: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79. Your input will help us assess the need for our services. Thank you!

Overall 16 % of users are feeling neutral. The discussion revolves around the concept of naying without a clear purpose or description. Some participants argue that naying without context is unproductive and can hinder progress, while others believe that it is a valid form of expression. Overall, the debate highlights the importance of providing reasoning behind dissenting opinions in order to foster constructive dialogue.

Overall 16 % of users are feeling against it. ChaosDAO voted unanimously against Referendum 156 due to lack of description and transparency. The decision to tip a party without justification is not supported by ChaosDAO, leading to a 100% nay vote.

AI-generated from comments

6Comments
17%
0%
67%
17%
0%
bLd Nodes | 😎ChadStakeKing
 
 
13th Apr '23
Voted Nay

Naying as long as no purpose/description provided

Pheeb
 
 
13th Apr '23

Voted nay because no description. Rock on Adam!!!

KRYPTOSCHAIN
 
 
13th Apr '23

I would normally vote Nay here because you didn't provide a description (not that it would matter cause of your huge voting power) but I'm assuming you're tipping Adam for his recent effort to come up with a solution for the Treasury so I hit the Aye ;-)

Sik | crifferent.de
 
 
13th Apr '23
Voted Nay

NAY from me for missing information.

dashboard profile icon
ChaosDAO_Referendum_Commission
 
 
20th Apr '23

ChaosDAO, in efforts to bolster transparency within the community, has offered the below rationale for its decision to vote Nay on Referendum 156.

Referendum 156 offered no description and was subsequently voted nay unanimously. ChaosDAO cannot in good faith be in favor of a proposal to tip a party with no description as to why that party is being tipped.

Overall vote: 100% Nay

OpenGovAssist
 
 
13th Aug '23

Hello,

We are in the process of validating a true need for a service to assist teams with crafting and completing successful treasury proposals, so they can focus on building. We would love to hear about your experience with this proposal. If you are willing to take a few minutes, please fill out this form about your experience with the OpenGov treasury proposal process: https://forms.gle/MwDij4adXEQd7Um79

Feel free to leave out any details that your team is not comfortable with sharing, but the more info you can provide, the better we will be able to assess the potential need for our services.

For more info, follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/OpenGovAssist


Discover similar proposals