Untitled Post
2 years ago
Timed Out
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (3)
Requested

160.00K DOT
Proposal Failed
2
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (5)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (255)0.0 DOT
Untitled Post
This is a ReferendumV2 post. It can only be edited by the proposer of the post .
Comments (3)
Requested
Proposal Failed
2
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (5)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (255)0.0 DOT
Please provide contextual information relating to this referendum. Note: If contextual information is not provided in a timely manner, it is likely that voters will nay vote you, and not revisit this once the contextual information has been provided, which will make passing this harder for you.
As a public community account receiving vote delegations from the public, ChaosDAO is now beginning an effort to publicly explain or summarize our voting rationale so that the public can better understand our community’s vote. Referendum 146 was quite an easy decision. This referendum requested 1,600 KSM from the big spender track for no apparent reason. 100% of the ChaosDAO vote was “Nay” given there was no discussion, no context added to the proposal, and as a third strike, the requested amount of 1,600 KSM did not even need the “Big Spender” track. As a reminder to the community, the maximum amounts for the spending tracks at the time of writing are as follows (with associated refundable decision deposit) -Small Spender: 333 KSM with 3.33 KSM decision deposit -Medium Spender: 3333 KSM with 6.66 KSM decision deposit -Big Spender: 33,333 KSM with 13.33 KSM decision deposit Occasionally we as a DAO recognize there are those who test out submitting proposals, but if this is the case, you must post some contextual information within a few hours after submitting your proposal in order for the community to understand what exactly you are requesting or testing.