Treasury Proposal: Moderation Team Bounty Top-up
3 years ago
Confirmed
Treasury Proposal: Moderation Team Bounty Top-up
Hello everyone!
With this post, we are requesting a top-up to the Moderation Team Bounty to continue funding their contributions and support to our community.
Due to the current market conditions, we are requesting this top-up earlier than we expected.
In addition, somes changes have been made to the initial proposal.
All of these changes and the details of the proposal, along with spending analysis, can be found HERE
Original Bounty Top-up Post can be found HERE
Thank you for your attention!
Comments (4)
Requested
595.69K DOT
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (200)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (49)0.0 DOT
Hey, I am not sure i understand the relationship between the first table (rates) and the second table (budget):  I understand it as 9 senior community managers for the total of 14k: is this correct? and if yes: how do you make this sustainable? I dont see all of these community managers being active in the channels we use, and wouldnt it make more sense to have less senior community managers and more lower level moderators to be able to structure a strategy for moderation, with times, channels distribution, etc? what is your strategy regarding this?
How do you account for activity? can recognize some Ambassadors, but have never seen more than 50% of them or their comments. wondering how it works. whats the min amount of hr that needs to be worked on the channels if you want to be a community mod?