A first testbed for a technical reviews bounty, aiming to complete the circle of on-chain proposal submission on Kusama and Polkadot Networks, by rewarding external developers who review deliverables of a funded proposal.

We have now, after some changes to the process, a more consolidated way of drafting and submitting treasury proposals for discussion, vote and deliver reports: but we find it difficult for Council members to fulfil a particular task: **to review the quality of the deliverables in a funded project**. The reason for this might be lack of time, expertise or both - we cannot expect all councillors to be experts in all topics a proposal touches.

We want to propose a bounty that will allow external technical users to review specific deliverables and be rewarded for it, supporting the work of the Council. 

Full link of the proposal can be found [HERE](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1awD1bv0XXyQnOKKEns7JvC2dL6TyV_ZCVtI_pmZX9jM/edit?usp=sharing): Please leave any comments, questions and concerns!


- They want to reward people who review and give feedback on projects.
- Council members have a hard time reviewing projects because they might not have enough time or expertise.
- They want to create a bounty to get external users to review projects.
- They have a proposal document with more details.
- They want people to leave comments, questions, and concerns about the proposal.

#496 Technical reviews by Kusama/Polkadot Developers