Polkassembly Logo

Create Pencil IconCreate
OpenGov

Notice: Polkadot has migrated to AssetHub. Balances, data, referenda, and other on-chain activity has moved to AssetHub.Learn more

View All Discussion

Treasury proposal: ParaSpell XCM SDK Maintenance funding for 5months

userParaSpell
2 years ago
treasury
research
referenda
education

Dear Kusama community,

On behalf of our team , we propose the maintenance bounty of a common good tool enhancing experience on the Polkadot ecosystem - ParaSpell XCM SDK & XCM UI that will work to aid team that have been previously funded by Kusama treasury (link) the Basilisk Parachain team (link1, link2) and the Web3 Foundation (phase1,phase2,phase3) which also proposed the idea of Treasury maintenance funding for this project here: link

More information on previous project funding and achievements can be found in our official docs: link

This maintenance proposal is for maintaining repositories and performing continued operations to improve XCM SDK & XCM UI in many useful ways mentioned in our application document below.

We believe that this tool is needed in Polkadot ecosystem and we are working very hard to prove this. Unification of XCM pallets which are currently very diverse can bring ease of integration and speed up dApp development significantly. This Polkadot forum post goes to show, that developers actively search for such tools. link

Links for repositories:

XCM SDK - link

An organization with all repositories - link

Our previous Kusama treasury funding - link

Delivery of Kusama treasury funded proposal - link

Our current metrics can be seen here - link , our SDK is also implemented by the biggest Polkadot NFT marketplace called KodaDot.

Further information on the maintenance mechanism, management of the funds and budget can be found in the maintenance proposal document.

This discussion will be held for 7 days until 27.May 2023. Feel free to post any questions. We will be glad to answer them as soon as possible.

Comments (2)

2 years ago

Hey Paraspell,

Thank you for posting your proposal. This report offers general feedback on the information presented in the proposal, aiming to improve its clarity and accessibility for a community while addressing potential areas for improvement.

Please note the
Audit report
is reflecting only the quality of information presented in the proposal and not the Quality of the project/idea itself. Please refer to the feedback in the areas with possible improvements.

Image

The following proposal Audit is created as a part of
OpenCommunity Governance.
More information about the Treasury proposal template and the Audit process can be found on the link above. All templates are free for everyone to use. For any questions or feedback regarding the Audit templates use the discussion link above.

Please note that the views and opinions presented in the Audit report are my personal and they do not represent general community opinion.

2 years ago

@coinstudio,

thank you for this report, we see, that there are some improvements to be made mentioned in the Budget and Deliverables sections. Our team will address this asap to make everything more clear to everyone. We will update this with another comment once improvements are made.
With kind regards,

Team ParaSpell

2 years ago

Hey ParaSpells team,

Thank you for the proposal.

Here's the pre-referendum audit for this treasury proposal.

Notes

  • This audit was not influenced by previous audits.
  • This audit reflects only the quality of information presented in the proposal and not the Quality of the project/idea itself.

Paraspells

The following proposal Audit is created as a part of the extension for Proposal#67. More information about the Treasury proposal template and the Audit process can be found on the link above. All templates are free for everyone to use. For any questions or feedback regarding the Audit templates use the discussion link from above.

2 years ago

Dear @Abdulbee

Thanks for your complex Audit.

We are pleased to see, that according to your Audit, our proposal improved and we are now ready to start referenda.

We see, that you suggested removing the header from pages other than the first page. We have upgraded the proposal according to your suggestion.

With kind regards,

Team ParaSpell

PleaseLogin to comment

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy