@councillors, two treasury proposals can be rejected based on the following info:

- [motion 137](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/treasury/137) is a proposal submitted mistakenly by Mr Excel. They have already submitted a corrected version of the proposal that was voted as [motion 445](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/motion/445) and already approved by Council a few weeks ago. The reason of the incorrect proposal is the use of extrinsics and the allocation unit measure in the extrinsics tab.

- [motion 141](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/treasury/141) is a proposal submitted by a UX developer studying the treasury submission process to work on some changes. This can be rejected with no issues. 

- Mr Excel submitted a treasury proposal by mistake, but he has already submitted a corrected version that was approved by the Council.
- The incorrect proposal used extrinsics and the allocation unit measure in the extrinsics tab.
- A UX developer submitted a proposal to study the treasury submission process, but it can be rejected without any problems.

#450 Rejection of treasury proposals 137 and 141

No Active Proposals