#9 saer
This is a bounty proposal whose proposer address (FojH2nCHFJqtwCq1imPTQL7d24U3zsQXg6bJph7KTHm8iHV) is shown in on-chain info below. Only this user can edit this description and the title. If you own this account, login and tell us more about your proposal.
Show More
[Deleted]

Voted Aye
I am in favor of closing Bounty 22. It was submitted in error (I thought that the extrinsic would fail for other reasons).
You will note that this account that I am posting with is the same as the account that submitted the bounty, and is a verified identity.
Voted Aye
Hi Paradox here BRA!!! Thanks for cloase the bounties, and sorry for not answering early i thought that it was alreday well with the last ref. I aprecciate your help,
THANKS BRA :)
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
1. Members identified that this referendum replaces referendum 266 which likely will not execute properly due to being from the incorrect origin.
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required provide any feedback as to why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect the right to anonymity of our members, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to provide feedback
Discover similar proposals
Voted Aye